1. When it seems worthwhile to try to develop individual security and confidence in problem solving and the democratic process. Such confidence gained in the huddle situation may extend to his participation in the total group situation. it is difficult to remain anonymous in a group of six.

2. When it is desired that the democratic process be bolstered in relation to possible authoritarian control.

3. When it seems advisable to stimulate motivation by a change of techniques.

4. When it appears that individual needs and interests are not being well expressed or met in the larger group situation.

5. When group standards and social controls are inadequate in the larger group and it is difficult to maintain thought and discussion at a suitable level. the huddle is a forcing situation for thought and discussion.

6. When one wishes to take full advantage of the hereto geniality of the group. Those with varying levels of experience knowledge or background are much more willing to speak up in the small group; to express minority ideas.

7. When communication and human relations skills are obviously not well distributed within the larger group.

8. When subject matter is of such nature as to make it more easily discussed in a small group.